People not interested in the upcoming Super Bowl can skip this, unless they're actually interested in reading my immortal prose (what? I repeat, what?) concerning the upcoming Super Bowl.
Two things are rather obvious at this point:
1) Outside of his little football world, Tom Brady is a woo-promoting jackass;
2) That's still no reason to go after his daughter in public, though, like one radio host did.
That being said, I'm under the impression that if anyone's going to upset The Belicheck Machine That Ate The AFC it might be Philly. The Eagles are every bit as capable of making life tough for opponents as the Pats are, and the fact that they mercilessly pounded the Vikings 38-7 in a game where the Vikes were favored by Vegas is proof of that. Even so, the Pats have more experience. And they have a quarterback who's incredibly skilled and pulling off last-minute wins even if he is a quack medicine-promoting idiot off the field.
So Pats by 2.
However...
I have shit luck picking Super Bowl winners since I started doing it again in 2006. Last year was a rare exception (Pittsburgh beating Arizona in 2008 was the other one, and I didn't even cover my own spread that time), but considering my lack of luck picking winners in - which years were they, now? - 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 you can at least rest assured that just because I was right about the Pats in 2016 I might not be this year considering my Monopoly money-worthless 2-9 record.
So, Pats haters? Don't give up hope.
Yet.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Newspaper of (W)rec(k)ord
If you're a member of a conrunning organization, you know you're in serious trouble when the Guardian - an internationally known...
-
If there's anything I've learned over the last few years it's that Paul's political groupies really need to get over themsel...
-
Adios, Pete. The Buzzcocks were easily one of my favorite first-generation punk bands growing up, capable of combining melodic sensibiliti...
No comments:
Post a Comment