Thursday, August 4, 2016

Well, f*ck you too, Clint

And this is another warning about how you should be wary of taking political advice that comes from the mouths of celebrities - even ones you admire, despite their politics.

You can read the meat of the mess via the link above, but this stretch of Mr. Eastwood's Wild Ride seems to be an object lesson in not how to articulate a thought:

ESQ: What do you think Trump is onto?

CE: What Trump is onto is he’s just saying what’s on his mind. And sometimes it’s not so good. And sometimes it’s … I mean, I can understand where he’s coming from, but I don’t always agree with it.
 
ESQ: So you’re not endorsing him?
 
CE: I haven’t endorsed anybody. I haven’t talked to Trump. I haven’t talked to anybody. You know, he’s a racist now because he’s talked about this judge. And yeah, it’s a dumb thing to say. I mean, to predicate your opinion on the fact that the guy was born to Mexican parents or something. He’s said a lot of dumb things. So have all of them. Both sides. But everybody—the press and everybody’s going, “Oh, well, that’s racist,” and they’re making a big hoodoo out of it. Just fucking get over it. It’s a sad time in history.

No offense to Clint - no, really - but the only reason why Candidate Stoathead decided to go after that judge is because that judge had both the misfortune to be involved in his Trump "University" case and because there is a very large network of Stoathead supporters who are, and will continue to be, screaming card-carrying racists. So they got to hear the dog whistle loud and clear because he's of Mexican descent. Never mind the little fact that he was born and raised in the US and is therefore this thing called an "American citizen" as a result; that's not what matters in the odd little universe populated by certain Trump supporters - Gonzalo Curiel's background is.

Then again, look at this way: Clint Eastwood is 86 years old. His complaints about Today's Youth (and consider that there's been roughly 3 intervening generations since he was born, so that's some sample size you've got, there) being overly sensitive and blah blah blah are probably not much different than what he heard from some (but not all) members of the generation that preceded his when he was a teenager in the late 40's and they'll probably be no different from the ones coming out of the mouths of some (but not all) millennials some twenty to thirty years after they've had kids. The problem is this: every generation looks down on their successors as somehow being either morally weaker or less courageous than they were, and it's all bullshit. Because that canard keeps getting repeated over and over again. Younger generations just have a different set of problems than previous ones. You can still get killed over essentially nothing if you're 25 now just as you could've bought the farm over trivial shit like your ethnic background or the color of your skin way back in 1946. What's different is that we think we know better. Or should.

As for Eastwood, well, he was a genius as an actor and director. No doubt about it. But that's as far as his genius goes. Looking for deep political insight from an actor is about as bright as asking a ballet dancer about their deep thoughts on quantum physics (or worse yet, asking another actor about what causes autism), but we spend an absurd amount of time giving a shit about their opinions due to the fact that they're! Really! FAMOUS! And being famous means that you have to have equally famous opinions, right?

Not really. And it'll be a sign of genuine societal maturity if people finally realize that fact.


 

2 comments:

  1. From Anne -
    The thing about Celebrity Culture - just as celebrity doesn't confer authority on any subject, neither does it disqualify you from having an opinion as a private citizen. But while celebrity might not disqualify a person, that doesn't mean that other things can not. For instance, I don't look to Woody Allen for guidance on morality. I roll my eyes at anything Jim Carey says, period. And ever since I saw an old man go on national TV and ramble disjointedly and without preparation at an empty chair for ten minutes, I've lost any respect for anything Eastwood might have to say about anything (except movie-making, maybe).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, Anne. I *still* think you need your own blog. And I agree; I just think that taking celebrity advice on something that is so screamingly outside their area of training and expertise is a sure sign of Nothing But Trouble coming down the way (frex, how many kids have died as a result of people taking Jenny McCarthy's poisonous views on vaccination and autism seriously?) unless that celebrity actually is (and I mean "is", not "seems") credible on the subject.

      As for Eastwood, you would think that someone who appeared in _White Hunter, Black Heart_ (which touches uncomfortably on the subjects of racism and anti-Semitism more than once) would've gained *some* perspective on issues like this, especially since he never seemed particularly prone to half-assed shoot from the hip opining without thinking before. But apparently not.

      Delete

Newspaper of (W)rec(k)ord

 If you're a member of a conrunning organization, you know you're in serious trouble when the  Guardian  -  an internationally known...