Fueless Cluck of the Month candidate Andrea Shea King just doesn't get lynching analogies. She uses them, to be sure, but that doesn't disprove the fact that she doesn't get them:
“I would like to think that these guys could pay with their lives, hanging from a noose in front of the U.S. Capitol Building,” she said. “What they are doing is they are putting their own interests above that of America, and to me that is criminal.”
Uh huh. Sure.
Meanwhile, the Department of Justice added a bit of nuance to the debate about police conduct in Ferguson, Missouri by publishing a report that doesn't exactly state that the situation there is peachy-keen despite the lack of a case against former Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson for the death of Michael Brown:
The City’s emphasis on revenue generation has a profound effect on FPD’s approach to law enforcement. Patrol assignments and schedules are geared toward aggressive enforcement of Ferguson’s municipal code, with insufficient thought given to whether enforcement strategies promote public safety or unnecessarily undermine community trust and cooperation. Officer evaluations and promotions depend to an inordinate degree on "productivity," meaning the number of citations issued. Partly as a consequence of City and FPD priorities, many officers appear to see some residents, especially those who live in Ferguson’s predominantly African-American neighborhoods, less as constituents to be protected than as potential offenders and sources of revenue.
This culture within FPD influences officer activities in all areas of policing, beyond just ticketing. Officers expect and demand compliance even when they lack legal authority. They are inclined to interpret the exercise of free-speech rights as unlawful disobedience, innocent movements as physical threats, indications of mental or physical illness as belligerence. Police supervisors and leadership do too little to ensure that officers act in accordance with law and policy, and rarely respond meaningfully to civilian complaints of officer misconduct. The result is a pattern of stops without reasonable suspicion and arrests without probable cause in violation of the Fourth Amendment; infringement on free expression, as well as retaliation for protected expression, in violation of the First Amendment, and excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
In other words, the DoJ ruling found that Wilson didn't deserve to get charged, but let's face it - the Brown incident was a oversized fuse trying to find a bomb to set off. And unfortunately, it did.
No comments:
Post a Comment